January 18, 2008
Republican Billionaire Spammer To Support Dr Spam?
Is this a perfect marriage made in internet land or what?
—————————————
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/16/richard_viguerie_goes_online_f.html
And the latest may be one of the most impressive of all. Ultimate Ron Paul was created by Richard Viguerie, often dubbed the “funding father of the conservative movement.” Viguerie, who founded Conservative Digest magazine in the 1970s, pioneered the use of computerized direct mail, helping raise billions for conservative organizations. Most recently, he authored “Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big-Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause.”
————————————-
Date: Jan 17, 2008 3:14 AM
Viguerie Launches Ron Paul Web Site
Billionaire’s Stance: www.UltimateRonPaul.com
Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:39 PM: Newsmax.com
Direct-mail guru Richard A. Viguerie has announced the launch of a new Web site, www.UltimateRonPaul.com.
“I remain uncommitted to any of the Republican candidates,” Viguerie said, “but it is clear that Ron Paul is truly a principled conservative in the grand tradition of Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan.”
Viguerie added, “By standing consistently for individual liberty and constitutionalism, Ron Paul has differentiated himself from all the other candidates, whose allegiance is to Big Government Republicanism.
“Paul’s principled stands have brought him a new and committed following. Many of them like what they’ve seen in the television debates, but they want to learn more about the candidate and what he stands for. UltimateRonPaul.com is designed to meet their needs by giving them everything they need to know about Ron Paul on one Web site.”
Viguerie, the author of “Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause,” pioneered ideological and political direct mail and has been called “the funding father of the conservative movement” for his role in helping build dozens of conservative organizations.
© 2008 All Rights Reserved.
———————————–
————————————————
Richard Viguerie Launches New Ron Paul Website
Contact: Bob Sturm, Vi Shields, after 6 PM Eastern 703-396-6974, 703-906-6542, 703-368-1812
MANASSAS, Virginia, Jan. 15 /Christian Newswire/ — Richard A. Viguerie, the author of Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause (Bonus Books, 2006), has announced the launch of a new website, www.UltimateRonPaul.com
“I remain uncommitted to any of the Republican candidates,” Viguerie said, “but it is clear that Ron Paul is truly a principled conservative in the grand tradition of Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan.”
Viguerie added, “By standing consistently for individual liberty and constitutionalism, Ron Paul has differentiated himself from all the other candidates, whose allegiance is to Big Government Republicanism.
“Paul’s principled stands have brought him a new and committed following. Many of them like what they’ve seen in the television debates, but they want to learn more about the candidate and what he stands for. UltimateRonPaul.com is designed to meet their needs by giving them everything they need to know about Ron Paul on one website.”
UltimateRonPaul.com aims to do this in a highly interactive way, with features such as:
· Petitions: One seeks to make certain that Ron Paul is included in the January 30 debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. Another seeks a full-fledged debate on foreign policy between Ron Paul and John McCain.
· Polls: The first one asks, “Who should be Ron Paul’s Veep?” Viguerie says: “To maximize the impact of their votes, we will release the results to thousands of national, state, and local media outlets, including more than 2,000 bloggers.”
· Blogs and forums, such as the Ron Paul Soapbox, where readers can speak out and communicate with each other.
· A contest to select the best Inaugural Address and the State of the Union Address for Ron Paul. Viguerie promises that “if Paul is nominated and then elected President, we will submit these entries to the President-elect and to the members of his transition team.”
· And an opportunity to give advice to Ron Paul, which will be forwarded to the candidate.
UltimateRonPaul.com also presents the latest and most important news about Ron Paul and his opponents, launches a Ron Paul Fan Club, and provides detailed information about the candidate and his policy positions.
——————————————————–
January 16, 2008
Ron Paul’s Amazing Fourth Place Finish In Michigan
Ron Paul’s Amazing Fourth Place Finish In Michigan
Only in Ron Paul land can raising $20 million then proceeding to finish fourth at 6% equate to a victory.
Enjoy these screen shots. I had to do some digging for them. These fruit cakes aren’t posting too much these days. I wonder why!!!
January 12, 2008
Another Secret Plan To Win
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1098.html
A Powerful & Unexpected Strategy for a Ron Paul Victory!
WARNING: Despite less-than-expected results in New Hampshire, the following strategy could secure Ron Paul the nomination for sole presidential candidate!!!
by Jordan Gustin
(Libertarian)
If you had to be really honest with yourself, I mean really honest, you would admit that Ron Paul did not do as well as you expected in New Hampshire. The media doesn’t take him seriously. They don’t even mention his name or his successes. Everything in the presidential race these days are expected. Attack ads are expected. Smear campaigns are expected.
But presidential campaigns aren’t so notorious for being strategic. What exactly would be considered strategic? What exactly could not be ignored?
An unexpected move.
Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War”, Chapter 11: “To take advantage of the enemy’s lack of preparation, take unexpected routes to attack where the enemy is not prepared.”
So what exactly am I getting at?? What ‘unexpected strategy’ am I proposing that could propel Ron Paul to victory? Keep reading; I promise you will walk away surprised at the simplicity of it all.
THE ENEMY:
The media. The media has censored Ron Paul and made up people’s minds for them. They have told the people “Ron Paul has no chance of winning” and this practically tells people not to vote for him. Everybody wants their vote to count. Ron Paul appeals to a lot of potential voters; Republican and Democrat. Even the Independents have an affection for the good Doctor! The strategy on the part of the media is to employ propaganda to keep the Ron Paul army small, and to exhaust the fight of the supporters.
THE VISION OF VICTORY:
For Ron Paul to win enough votes to give him a majority or large percentage of delegates.
THE OBSTACLE:
Ron Paul hasn’t placed higher than 5th place in any primary or caucus so far. He only has 2 delegates. He needs about another 800-1,000 or so to have a great chance. He needs the support of the Republican voters. But how can the Republicans vote for Dr. Paul if:
1.) They don’t hear much about him
2.) He hasn’t made a “credible” showing in the primaries
3.) Even if they like him, he doesn’t have as many votes as other “frontrunners”?
THE STRATEGY:
An unexpected move that gains attention and votes. Dennis Kucinich (a friend of Ron Paul) drops out ASAP and tells his strong base of supporters that if they vote for Obama, they will have no chance of seeing him in office. BUT if they vote for Ron Paul, if they join forces with the Paul campaign and vote for Dr. Paul, they will see their candidate as Vice President in ‘08. Here is the plan of attack and why it will work:
1.) First, enough people make enough noise in support of this strategy that the Paul and Kucinich campaigns pick up wind about it and give it serious consideration.
2.) Second, the campaigns go into negotiations. The negotiations are: that Dennis agrees to drop out of the race and voice his endorsement for Ron Paul and tell his supporters to vote for Dr. Paul. On the part of Dr. Paul’s campaign, they agree that they will invite Dennis Kucinich to be Ron’s running mate if nominated. If he doesn’t get nominated for Republican candidate, they could still run together as running mates as Independents. The appeal and support for the two of them would be so undeniably strong that not even Mayor Bloomberg would stand a chance.
3.) Third, Dennis goes forward and drops out as planned. Dennis supporters make noise and voice their support for Dr. Paul (while also holding unwavering support for Dennis).
4.) Paul and Kucinich supporters vote for Paul in the next few primaries. Paul places in 4th or even 3rd place, positions not even CNN can ignore with their pie charts! Ron Paul gains credibility even to the least informed Republicans. Newfound interest and support grows for the undeniable appeal of Dr. Paul as a wealth of knowledge is available about him on the internet and through his supporters.
THE SNOWBALL EFFECT TAKES PLACE AND RON PAUL KEEPS REAPING IN THE VOTES AND PLACING HIGHER AND HIGHER, ESPECIALLY IF THIS IS DONE BEFORE SUPER TUESDAY!!! ENOUGH DELEGATES ARE WON FOR DR. PAUL THAT HE HAS THE REASON TO CONTINUE FORWARD AFTER FEBUARY 5TH.
5.) Due to the “surprise” Ron Paul brings, Fred Thompson and possibly Rudy Giuliani drop out of the race. This brings us down to about 4-5 Republican candidates after Super Tuesday. Ron Paul will continue consistently placing 3rd or higher from then on out.
WHY THIS COULD HAPPEN:
1.) With Richardson out of the race, Kucinich supporters could gain concievably about 1/3 to 1/2 of his supporters by reaching out and appealing to a ‘lone’ crowd, as well as many supporters who would vote for Kucinich but want their vote to count so they plan to vote for Edwards or Obama instead. If they all joined together for Kucinich and voted for Dr. Paul, this could bring Dr. Paul anywhere from 3-5% additional votes. Bringing him around a 4th and very likely a 3rd placing in the following primaries.
2.) Kucinich supporters are dedicated too. If they all banded together to see their candidate as Vice President by voting for Ron Paul, this could really, really work.
3.) Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are friends. They both want to end bi-partisan politics. They both want to see the Constitution in full use. They both want to end the Iraq War. Dr. Paul has voiced his support for Dennis on Jay Leno towards the end of this clip. Dennis Kucinich had voiced his support for Ron Paul unwaveringly on this clip here. They really admire each other! This isn’t just wishful thinking!!!
4.) Because it is coming down to the wire and we all know we (the Kucinich and Paul supporters) need a new strategy to see our candidates in office.
5.) Because this is compromise and would bring the country together to have a Republican President and a Democrat Vice President working together to uphold the Constitution and save this great nation from the clutches of Facism and Socialism.
To the supporters of:
Dr. Paul: You may not agree with 100% of what Dennis believes in, but you do see that this could be our last real chance to see Dr. Paul as a presidential nominee! Dr. Paul is a rarity and there is no one else like him in government today who could be his running mate. Kucinich is the best choice and is a Constitutionalist of good character!
Mr. Kucinich: So you may not agree with everything Ron Paul has to say, but you do know that you really want to see Dennis Kucinich (a good man!) as a leader in this country. Is this be reason enough why you’d be willing to vote for Ron Paul if the negotiation takes place? It’s reason enough for us Paul supporters!
- - -
Let’s join forces and show the world that Americans will not be controlled by the media!! This could be our last chance and best strategy for REAL CHANGE by HONEST MEN and TRUTHFUL POLITICIANS who are the modern Founding Fathers!!!
THIS IS NO TIME TO BE PICKY. THIS IS NOT A TIME TO WAIT. IT’S NOW OR NEVER, IT’S BAND TOGETHER OR LOSE!!
THIS. JUST. MIGHT. WORK.
January 10, 2008
January 9, 2008
Paul Supporters Plan On Sabotaging Huckabee Rally
Paul Supporters Plan On Sabotaging Huckabee Rally
More comic relief
I know, I know, I said in my last post I’d be done, but there is just too much comic relief to be had at these idiots expense. Read the troll initial post then read the replies. I like how they keep saying things like, “Well just wait until ‘fill in the blank’” Before Iowa it was wait till Iowa, then it was wait til Wyoming, then it was wait til New Hampshire. Now it’s wait til Feb 5th. hahah..Kinda appropriate it’s on the fifth:)
The Revolution is over
I don’t care how they spin it, the revolution is officially over.
For a Libertarian to finish in fifth, as of now, in New Hampshire, well that’s a big indicator.
Him finishing fifth in Libertarian, live free or die, New Hampshire, is like going to an Oakland Raiders home game and only finding five fans in Raiders Jerseys.
If there was a place the revolution could break out, this is it! But it wasn’t it.
I’m done doing anything with this site. What has been said about Ron Paul is all that can be said.
It’s proven that him and his followers are officially irrelevant to this political process.
They can gather a loud, large crowd online and on street corners, but they can’t gather enough real life votes to really matter.
Reality
Yeah a group of kids gathering at one time with signs fully reflects reality…
January 8, 2008
My predictions for tonight…
Here are my predictions for New Hampshire tonight.
Paul finishes fourth. Despite finishing fourth in a state known for it’s “libertarianness”, Paul supporters will claim a victory because they finished in front of some big named candidate.
They’ll tout a 10%ish vote count and say this is also a victory. This will be full proof the revolution has hit America.
A day or two down the road some conspiracy theory will be released that shows Paul really won or finished better than before.
More
I’m just compiling BS so we can all enjoy a laugh later today..
http://powerplay.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/01/08/ron-paul-new-hampshires-big-surprise/
Just because I’ll need something to laugh at
I’ll need something to laugh at tomorrow when Paul finishes fourth or worse.
Video…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnOKmL3785o
Dixville Notch NH, Rejects Ron Paul
The first place to vote in the NH primary has rejected Ron Paul No votes at all. I’m sure we’ll hear some conspiracy theories in a few days.
Excuses for losing
So we already have some excuses for not losing…
This is the excuse for losing Iowa….
From The Daily Paul…or so I’m told:
To those who haven’t heard, the results reported by CNN on caucus night were ‘Straw Poll’ results.
The straw poll is the first part of the caucus. The Straw Poll portion of the caucus is just that; a poll like any other except this one is still incomplete.
What CNN fails to mention is that what REALLY counts in getting the Iowa nomination is the what happens in second part of the Iowa caucus. This is when DELEGATES are SELECTED. Having a good number of Delegates is what will get a Dr Paul nominated.
According to Ron Paul supporters in Iowa there were roughly 80% people that went home before nominating and SELECTING DELEGATES.
In at least one precinct Ron Paul got 50% of the delegates since most of the other non-Paul supporters went home before selecting them. Their supporters were either unaware or too lazy to stick around for the most important part of the caucus.
This is where we shined, and as usual, we were more educated, more motivated and knew what really counted. The number of delegates aren’t tracked, therefore cannot be reported. We may have gotten 50% of the total delegates for Iowa. This may be optimistic but there is no way to know until the final delegates are selected at the state convention.
What this means is the numbers reported by CNN, the numbers that say Huckabee is 1st and Romney is 2nd etc (poll numbers), have nothing to do with who will get nominated in Iowa and we don’t yet have access to the numbers that count (delegates). Iowa is far from over and the Republican nominee is only selected after 3 more conventions.
Take a look at this sticky at Ron Paul Forums:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/
It is likely that Ron Paul did get 3rd or better. Who controls the (dis)information? CNN has no idea where anyone placed in the numbers that count yet they report on numbers that benefit their corporate master’s choices based on an incomplete poll. They barely mentioned his name caucus night and then there was their conspicuous missing piece in their Pie-chart.
This is just more BS mindgames directed at us (psy-ops) by old media. It is sabotage meant to demotivate us, frustrate us into quitting and suppress any posibble new supportes from discovering the only real Republican candidate.
CNN is as bad or worse than Fox with their tactics. They are only slightly more covert in their undermining but equally as transparent.
Do you think CNN’s corporate masters are going to allow them to provide us with feedback of our growing successful revolution? Would they sabotage Ron Paul if he is losing or has no chance?
These are the same old tactics by old media and if we continue the battle we will win.
Long Live the Revolution!
——————————–
This is the excuse for losing wyoming….
Wyoming Party Hacks Reject Ron Paul
Posted January 5th, 2008 by antiwarWyoming GOP county conventions gave their delegates to Romney, Thompson, McCain, and Hunter. But Ron Paul never stood a chance there.
We shouldn’t have expected anything from Wyoming. Most observers didn’t understand the rules.
The Wyoming county conventions were NOT open to Republican voters. Eligible delegates consisted of only two groups: Republican party officials who were elected in 2006; and delegates who were appointed (by established precinct organizations) to fill empty delegate seats. The rules are explained here.
Each county convention elected either one delegate or one alternate. They were assigned one or the other by the state party based on past vote totals for GOP candidates in their county.
Each county convention was presented with delegate candidates, who were either pledged to a Presidential candidate or unpledged. The winner in each county had to get over 50%, so runoffs were held.
In most cases, the winning delegate candidates were county party leaders who were chosen because of who they were, rather than who they are supporting for President.
Wyoming’s system is a throwback to the old days of backroom nominations. There was little chance for new party activists to participate in this process, only old-timers made the choice.
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/21425————————————
I can’t wait until the excuses for losing New Hampshire come in.
January 7, 2008
More proof of harassment
More proof Paul supporters use harassment. This guy gloats over it.
Here is a link to our official page dedicated to exposing all their harassing techniques.
Mountains Out Of Mole Hills?
Someone found my site and put this in their blog. How come a history of racist policies and practices, a history of being double minded and the like is considered, “making a mountain out of a mole hill?”
Just as expected, here come the conspiracy theories..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUJZnKPInhA
The thing is, they posted this video with the title, vote count fraud, but this video just asserts it, it doesn’t prove it.
January 6, 2008
Paul Supporters Make Paul Look Like A Third Rail Candidate
Paul supporters don’t come right out and say he’s a third rail candidate, but their actions and talk seem to indicate such a view.
They are bragging on and on about his 10% in Iowa and his fifth place finish and his winning in Jefferson County. This is the mantra that to them proves Ron Paul is a winner. It’s fine if they brag about such things, but what are the implications of bragging about these kinds of numbers?
If you brag about weak numbers like this, you are admitting two things. Either Paul is a third rail candidate who did well and exceeded expectations or he is a top tier candidate who did poorly.
There are only two options here my friends. Ron Paul is either a third rail candidate who did well, or he is a top tier candidate who sucked. The only kind of candidate who can brag about finishing fifth at 10% is a third rail candidate. I agree, for a third rail candidate that is a good turn out. But at the end of the day he’s still a third rail candidate if that is all you’re left to brag about.
If your argument is that Paul is a top tier candidate, then you better not be talking about the greatness of a fifth place finish at 10%. Because those are not numbers a top tier candidate goes around talking about to show how good they are. Especially if they have raised $20 million and have more yard signs than there are corn stalks in Iowa.
So my question to Paul supporters is this. Is he a third rail candidate who did good or a top tier candidate who did poorly? You can’t have it both ways.
Ron Paul Not The President Of Germany Or The NFL
BREAKING NEWS……RON PAUL IS NOT THE PRESIDENT OF GERMANY OR THE NFL..
That’s right, look right here folks. Ron Paul is not the president of Germany…
He’s not president of the NFL either…
But this Paulite is certain Paul will be president of New Hampshire.
Paulies Trust TEH Pollz Now…..
So for months and months when discussion of polls was brought to the attention of Paul supporters, all we heard was this endless mantra of how they can’t be trusted because they don’t call cell phones.
But now Paul is at 14% in New Hampshire. All the sudden they have a new mantra.
Let’s have a look back at their old mantra…
And now a look at their new mantra….
My how time hath changed ones views.
January 5, 2008
Ron Paul is not president of Wyoming Either.
After the miserable finish in Iowa at fifth place, some of the Paul followers had a sun shiny out look for Wyoming’s caucus today. They employed some logic to guarantee his certain success.
So how did their positive logic pan out in Wyoming? Look at the Paul sign in the screen shot, lol.
That’s right, Paul finishes in last place, just ahead of “uncommitted”. So basically the one’s who’s followers should be committed….eh you get the joke.
So to recap………
Iowa Results…
Wyoming Results
But some good news.
He’s still president of the Internets.
He’s still president of 10% of Iowa Republicans.
He’s still president of college town Jefferson County Iowa.
He’s still leading the Wyoming Uncommitted vote.
Viva La-Revolution!!!!!
10% Bragging Rights?
I still don’t understand why Paul supporters are bragging and gushing over Paul’s 10% showing in Iowa.
There were four other candidates who finished ahead of him, three of them are and were in worst financial standing than him and yet they are just bragging about a tenth place finish. It doesn’t make sense.
If Paul can brag and gush about his 10% then can’t Thompson and Mccain brag and gush about their 13%? I think it was 13%. Either way it was more than Paul got.
They brag and gush about beating Rudy. But so did four others.
They brag and gush about winning Jefferson County. So what!
They can talk all they want about how Paul is this under dog candidate, but he’s had tons of media exposure, raised 20 million and claims to have tons of supporters and they claim they’re in a revolution.
If they can claim victory and brag over their 10% and 1 county win, then it follows the other candidates can brag and gush too. Right?
Mike Huckabee Looks Odd, But Ron Paul Looks Totally Normal???
I found this in the “Huckabee Exposed” Myspace group…*rolls my eyes* wonder where they got that idea from?
Apparently Mike Huckabee is a weird lookin fellow.
Click here to see the full screen shot
Here are my observations when it comes to looks. Maybe it’s just me?
Well I’m so glad Ron Paul is normal looking…..
January 4, 2008
Run Pull Wins Iowa By A Landslide
I don’t know what kool-aid, pot combo this guy had before typing, but it must be good.
The Ronvolution Is Over..Onward To New Hampshire…
Thank you Iowa indpendents for selecting Barack Obama and John Mccain. I sense a trend going on here. The ronvolution is over, the independent vote in New Hampshire will go to Obama and Mccain. But the Ronbots are having fun deluding themselves.
The Paulites have been passing around this “positive bulletin” around myspace. Of course it is filled with kool-aid delusions and glaring double standards.
(1) Contrary to what some here believe, we did significantly outperform our polls, just as we had been saying we would do all along.
According to Real Clear Politics, we were polling at 7.3% in the last five polls taken before the caucus (on average) yet, as of writing this, we are at 9.8%,
Significantly outperforming? I don’t think three points is significant. It’s three points. Huckabee must be burning the walls down because he won by over eight points and the polls projected him behind or only up two points at the most.
Look at the double standard here as they brag about “beating” Giuliani.
(3) We destroyed former front-runner Rudy Giuliani—absolutely destroyed him with almost triple his vote total—and don’t be fooled—Rudy didn’t compete here because he couldn’t compete not because he didn’t want to.
(2) Despite the fact that we put very little effort into Iowa until very late in the game and despite the fact that Ron Paul spent less time in Iowa than any other candidate (in a state where in-person campaigning is essential) and despite our shabby treatment by the mainstream media we still were just 3 points out of third place.
Say huh? Ok, they love touting how they beat Giuliani, and they won’t admit his poor performance came because he didn’t show up in Iowa. That is not considered a factor at all in explaining why Rudy did so bad. Yet that is a factor to consider when wondering why Paul did so bad!?
Good news my friends, The Ronvolution is over. They’ll spin this as a victory even after he admits his defeat.
January 2, 2008
Ron Paul Is A Sly Dog, Slippery Politician
At first glance, Ron Paul comes off as this idealist guy, up there just talking from his heart about what he thinks is right. He may appear misguided to some. Some may disagree with him, yet perceive he is a good politician, unlike those sleaze bag candidates he is running against. This perception is the furthest from the truth.
Ron Paul is also a sleaze bag politician. He may even be worse than some of the others.
Let’s start with his earmark spending.
He leads his district in earmarks.
Link
Now this is where it gets interesting. This is where he turns into a sly dog, slippery politician. In one breath he argues doggedly for putting them in the bill. He talks with great passion about why they should be included. LINK
Look at the passion and logic he uses for including these earmarks in the bills. You’d think a man with a passion to put the stuff in the bill, the endless justifications to put it in, you’d think he would vote yes! But instead he votes no.
Does this seem like the actions of someone who isn’t a sly dog, slippery politician? If you’re for something, then you vote for it. If you’re against something, then you vote no. Paul is trying to say yes and no at the same time.
Most politicians get raked over the coals for changing their opinions over time. Paul is worse! He is politically schizophrenic and tries to have two opposing opinions at the same time. He’s not voting for something after he votes against it. He’s voting yes while voting no! But it doesn’t end here.
This guy can’t decide if he’s a Republican, Libertarian or an Independent. His first five terms in Congress were as a Republican. Then in 1988 he had a chance to run for president as a Libertarian. So he sends a letter of resignation to the GOP and runs for president as a Libertarian. A few years later he decides to run for Congress and what does he run as? A Republican of course. In 08 he’s running for president as a Republican, but he won’t rule out a run on a different party. LINK This reeks of political opportunism to me. He’s even admitted he’s running as a Republican this time because it’s more politically expedient. Easier to get on ballots and be seen in debates.
To top it off, Paul proposed term-limits, but then served ten terms in Congress. He has fun explaining this one. LINK
Ron Paul is indeed a sly dog, slippery politician. He tries to vote yes and no at the same time, chooses party affiliation based on what works best for him and he is both for and against term-limits.
Why does all this matter? Because much of his following comes because he comes off as a non-politician. He’s got that whole Mr. Smith goes to Washington mojo thing going for him. Ron Paul is anything but a Mr. Smith. He’s more like “Mr. Average Politician”. He’s not Doctor No. He’s Doctor Yes\No\Maybe and totally politically-schizophrenic. Can such a man be trusted?
