Has anyone noticed how Ron Paul doesn’t go after Mitt with as much gusto as he does Santorum, Gingrich, Perry and others? Why is this? Why would Ron Paul put all his gusto in to the guys who aren’t leading, and basically leave Romney alone. Yes he’s gone after Romney a little bit, but not as much as he has the others. Why is this?

It’s because Ron Paul is Mitt Romney’s prison bitch. Yes that’s right. Mitt pulls out his pocket and Ole Ronny hangs on and gleefully follows Mitt around the prison yard.

The Washington Post recently did an article on an alliance between Paul and Romney.

It all makes sense now. Ron Paul, Romney’s prison bitch, raises money so Paul can run negative adds against anyone who comes close to giving Romney a run for his money. Sure Paul gives Romney a little flack too, but that’s just part of the show. Ron Paul wouldn’t ever dare kneecap Romney hard, because he’s someone’s bitch.

I wonder how Paultards like this? All that money you’re sending in is actually going to help Romney defeat Newt, Santorum and Perry. Damn! It just makes sense doesn’t it!

We all wondered why they seem so civil with each other. We all wondered why he spent so much money on negative ads, that attacked everyone with so much fervor. Well everyone but Romney. (Again, yes Paul gave Romney a wee tad bit of flack, but not that much.) It was all because  Ron Paul is Mitt’s prison bitch.

That makes every Paultard a prison bitch of Mitt too, because those idiots spend all their hard work and money, funding commercials that attack everyone but Mitt!

Now if this is indeed a fake interview created in 1996, then the Paulbots need to start an email campaign to the DMN to have this fake interview taken out of their archives. I’m freaking serious here Paulbots. Since you’re in deny reality mode, start a campaign to get ‘the fabricated story’ taken out of their archives.

Let’s see how that goes for you.

http://ronpaulexposed.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/100-proof-ron-paul-knew-about-his-racist-newsletters-pictures-links-evidence/

PROOF RON PAUL KNEW ABOUT HIS NEWSLETTERS

In an interview with the Dallas Morning News, which you can purchase at this link, Ron Paul shows clear knowledge of these newsletters and justifies what’s in them. Now if he didn’t know they existed, and if he had nothing to do with them, then how come he’s justifying them? Here’s his own words.

Dr. Paul, who is running in Texas’ 14th Congressional District, defended his writings in an interview Tuesday. He said they were being taken out of context. 

Dr. Paul also said he did not know how his newsletter came to be ! included in a directory by the Heritage Front, a neo-Nazi group based in Canada. The newsletter was listed on the Internet under the directory’s heading “Racialists and Freedom Fighters.”

In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness of black men. 

“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” Dr. Paul said.

He also said the comment about black men in the nation’s capital was made while writing about a 1992 study produced by the National Center on Incarceration and Alternatives, a criminal justice think tank based in Virginia.

Citing statistics from the study, Dr. Paul then concluded in his column: `Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.”

“These aren’t my figures,” Dr. Paul said Tuesday. “That is the assumption you can gather from the report”

There is no longer any denying that Ron Paul knew about these newsletters. He even went as far as to justifying the content. So now that it’s clearly established that these newsletters are indeed his, and that he justified what is in them, where do we go from here? How bout we look at content in the newsletters! (More sources proving the above.)

RACIST STATEMENTS MADE IN THE NEWSLETTERS

“We don’t think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such.”

“Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions,”

“I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal,”

we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational.

Sounce

SOME PICTURES

FINAL THOUGHTS

Could this be any clearer? Ron Paul clearly knew about the newsletters. He clearly justified the content. Ron Paul profited off of this racist content. You can not deny the truth.

Some followers of Ron Paul will still try to wiggle out of the facts. When they try to wiggle out of the facts, what they really mean to say is, “I’m comfortable with racism.”

We can’t afford to trust the POTUS office to someone who knowingly profited off of racism for years.

Make no mistake about it, Ron Paul would stand up for the right of a state to lynch a black man, simply because he’s black. In Ron Paul’s book states rights trump human rights. This isn’t hyperbole or exaggerated rhetoric. We’re only one generation removed from a culture that lynched and oppressed black people. If given the power, those policies could and would be legal again in parts of our country and Ron Paul would let it happen. Ron Paul IS dangerous and would destroy our liberties.

Anyone who supports Ron Paul is a racist sympathizer. The evidence that verifies Ron Paul’s racism is overwhelming. The implications of Ron Paul’s ideals have been spelled out. Anyone who supports him is without excuse. If you support this man, you are indeed 100% compliant and supportive of racism and oppression of people. You can’t wiggle or argue your way out of it. You stand hand in hand with the KKK, Stormfront and the pro-slavery people we fought a war against.

I serve a racist savior,
he’s in the world today..
I know that he is racist because of what his newsletters say.
I see his desire for lynchings.
I hear the heils of cheer.
At just the time i miss him
a youtube spam is near….
He’d lynch..he’d lynch..
ron paul he’d lynch today..
he spams oh he spams me…
along the nets broad highway..
he’d lynch he’d lynch..
racism to impart…
You ask me how I know he’d lynch…
his newsletters said the part…